On 10/26/05, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luke Arno wrote: > > >You are asking for a negative proof. > > > >You should prove why the constraint you demand > >is needed. If not, leave the door open. > > > > > > > I am not demanding any constraints. In fact, I've stated many times that > a constraint forbidding hierachical collections should NOT be included > in the core. What I want you to do is demonstrate why an *existing > constraint* should be lifted. The door is *currently shut*; so long as > the door is not welded shut, why should we open it as opposed to simply > leaving it closed. >
Just because it is not explicitly stated you say it is not constrained. Then you contradict yourself with you closed door analogy. > >http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/rest_arch_style.htm > > > > > And your purpose for referencing Dr. Fielding's work is....? > Null Style. I am sure you are familiar but I thought you could use a reminder. - Luke
