On 29/10/05 6:42 AM, "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Politically, WG wise, life would be nicer too. The XOXO advocates can write >>> a "XOXO Introspection Format For Atom" spec, the XMP advocates can write a >>> "XMDP Introspection Format For Atom", (and so on) ... and there'll be no >>> shit fight as to who gets their format into the Atom Publishing Protocol >>> spec. >>> >>> >> >> The answer to this is to create our own format so nobody gets what they >> want. No Religious Formats [1]. >> >> +1 to a custom introspection format. >> >> > Let's hold off on debating solutions until we've got consensus on the > core requirements of the problem we're trying to solve Would be nice though to see several competing solutions, developed to be the best they can each be, without the inevitable compromises arising from having to satisfy everyone on the WG. If it turns out that there is one solution of the lot that everyone thinks is wonderful, and the other solutions didn't get fully filled out, we can always agree to un-fork in favour of that solution. This is more a WG scheduling/process/mgmt thing ... Tim/Paul, your thoughts? e.
