Robert Sayre wrote:
James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Updated Summary of recent paces... Appologies if I've missed or mischaracterized any.
Please don't attempt to surmise what I (or anyone else) believe, are arguing
for, or whether any of the proposals have consensus. I found many of your
statements inaccurate. Brief summaries of what the Paces say would be useful and
welcome.

All statements are based on my interpretation of the paces and recent discussion surrounding them. Due to the vast amount of discussion and significant number of paces, it is quite possible and likely that my interpretation is flawed in some cases. As always, feel free to correct any inaccuracies.

- James

Reply via email to