PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. If you disagree with any of the
consensus calls, pull that out as a separate thread.
<co-chair-mode>
This is based on James Snell's work in pulling together a list of
active Paces (thanks James), although we started by erasing James'
editorial material (sorry James) - it represents the co-chairs' view
of where consensus stands. The downside is that if James missed any,
then so did we.
Modifing metadata on media resources
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/
PaceReworkPostOnMemberResource (snell)
This got no discussion whatsoever that we could find in the WG. Put
it to-discuss, although frankly we are highly dubious that it has
much chance of consensus.
Pub control
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceDropControl (arno)
Received no +1s aside from Luke, some strong resistance, a few waverers.
Will not get consensus. Close it.
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceWorkflows (arno)
The WG was leaning positive but uncertain. Schedule this one formally.
Error response
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/
PaceBetterHttpResponseCode (snell)
First cut got some resistance; it was revised, the revised version
had lots of support and no -1's. Mark it "accepted" in its revised
version.
Collection Model
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceSimpleIntroduction
(sayre)
Deferred for discussion of collection traversal.
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceFeedsNotCollections
(sayre)
Got some friendly interest, no -1's, schedule formally
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceReworkProtocolModel
(snell)
No discussion, schedule formally
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/
PaceReworkCollectionMembership (snell)
No discussion, schedule formally
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/
PaceReworkCollectionListing (snell)
No discussion, schedule formally
Introspection
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveListTemplate
(sayre)
Deferred for discussion of introspection options
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceUseAppOutlines (sayre)
Deferred for discussion of introspection options
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveMemberTypeMust
(sayre)
No consensus yet, but not impossible; schedule formally.
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceXoXoIntrospection
XOXO option no longer on the table, close it.
Member-type extensibility
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveRegistry (sayre)
Accepted (but Gregorio thinks there is some missing language?)
Listing members
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceEditLinkMustToMay
(arno/sayre)
No consensus yet, but not impossible; schedule formally.
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceListTemplates (snell)
This tries to make URI templates more complicated while there's a
significant faction in favor of just removing them. Very unlikely to
get consensus support. Close it.
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/
PaceOrderCollectionsByAppModified (broyer)
No consensus, rejected.
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveListTemplate2
(broyer)
Deferred for discussion of collection traversal.
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceListPaging (snell)
Deferred for discussion of collection traversal.
Invalid Atom / atom:id handling
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceMagicId (arno)
Rejected. There is consensus that clients SHOULD submit valid Atom
entries, and we do not specify any server behaviors with respect to
handling of atom:id values.
(see http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg02739.html)
(see http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg02829.html)
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/
PaceSimplifyClarifyBetterfyRemoveBogusValidityText (sayre)
Accepted.
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceServerIdGeneration
(davis)
Rejected.
Roundtripping (related to Invalid Atom / atom:id handling)
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveWhoWritesWhat
(arno)
Accepted, but note de hÓra's point that some expectation-setting
language in the spec would be useful.
Arno, Sayre +1
de hÓra, Scheid friendly but want some expectation setting
Collection POST requirements
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveAcceptPostText
(sayre)
Partially accepted. Server doesn't have to do anything, but does
have to signal success with 201.
(see http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg02511.html)
Deleting resources
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/
PaceClarifyCollectionAndDeleteMethodByWritingLessInsteadOfMore
(sayre)
Accepted. (note argument from WebDAV consistency)
Security
* http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/
PaceRemoveSecurityUnspecification (sayre)
Settled, see http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg02556.html
</co-chair-mode>
