On 9 Nov 2005, at 17:07, Luke Arno wrote:
It sounds like you need a workflow. Create a feed of entries with some flag extension. Flag all your unprocessed entries. Remove the flag as you process them so that they will disappear from the feed. Ordering by updated still poses no problem that I can see. http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceWorkflows
Missing text on the wiki there...
I acknowledge that back-splicing old entries into a feed after the fact will cause them to be missed at sync. Repairing broken feeds and the like would require the client to either a walk back through the whole feed (or at least to a specified date) or use a "repaired entries" feed of some kind.
interesting idea
I this such a common case that we need to change the ordering of feeds in the core to make it easier? (sincere question)
Mhh. I am not sure. Probably not.
Is there some implication of your example that I missed?
I need to think about this more.
- Luke
