Thomas Broyer wrote: > If this is not core, at least let implementations the possibility to order > collection membership listing by something different from atom:updated. > protocol-06 reads “The entries in the returned Feed MUST be ordered by > their 'atom:updated' property” which prevents any app:modified-style > extension.
Don't take this as an objection to your idea, but I don't understand how allowing a variety of sort-bys relates to a client syncing with a server? cheers Bill
