On 1/29/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Took just a quick test run through this. It looks pretty much like it > just stores whatever you give it, even if it isn't valid Atom.
Correct, as of now it only enforces some minimal requirements: atom:updated and atom:id. > Extension > elements were preserved. id was changed. The basic operations all > seemed to work tho. I'd much prefer to get an error back if an entry I > post doesn't meet minimum atom requirements. Plan on this implementation bifurcating into multiple endpints. One of those will be a collection that strictly enforces valid Atom, others will do things to intentionally test a clients limitations. -joe -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
