Regarding the paces I've written...
Current
Alternatives re: Security considerations
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceFixSecurityConsiderations
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceBasicAuthentication
Alternatives re: Fixing media collections
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceFixMediaCollections
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceEditLinkRelation
Other
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceAssumeNoBaseUri
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceCategoryListing2
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceKeepOrCreateNewAtomId
Withdrawn
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceBasename
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceBasename2
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceCollectionFeed
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceCollectionRole
- James
Tim Bray wrote:
>
> <co-chair-mode>
> Draft -08 has been out for a few days now; I didn't notice any
> inconsistencies with our consensus calls and haven't heard any gripes,
> so Paul and I assume it's a fair reflection of where we stand.
>
> I get the impression that interoperability testing is being held up by a
> lack of client implementations; I see several servers out there. Henry
> Story of Sun tells me he'll have an -08 client ready for testing Real
> Soon Now. Any others?
>
> I've seen a few scattered Paces here and there; while at this point I
> think that interop is more important than adding functionality, let's do
> another Pace shakedown, as in get anything new in by Friday March 3rd,
> and anything that doesn't specifically reference -08 by that point will
> be deemed to be closed.
>
> -Tim
> </co-chair-mode>
>
>