We have a couple of pace's in the hopper for dealing with categories. Perhaps we could just implement a few ideas, see what works in code, then write up a pace from that?
Wanna take a first pass? - James David M Johnson wrote: > > > On Mar 8, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Tim Bray wrote: >> <co-chair-mode> >> We said we were doing a Pace moratorium last Friday. However, we >> observe that interop testing seems to be proceeding apace. Also, here >> at the ETech conference, I've heard about several other guerilla >> implementations, people doing APP just to solve some problem or >> another. We observe: >> >> 1. Implementors aren't waiting for things to be finished to start >> implementing. >> 2. There's a nonzero chance that the interop testing will turn up some >> vast, stinking cowpie that nobody's noticed. >> >> So, let's relax a bit, kick around the Paces we have, and wait till >> the interop testers start making happy noises before we fire this off >> to the iETF. >> </co-chair-mode> -Tim > > > I didn't realized we had a moratorium. Does this mean, since none of the > category paces made it through the ringer, that category support is not > going to make it into final Atom protocol? > > - Dave > >
