All of the tests have been rolled back in place. If anyone has issues with how the test suite interprets the spec(s) then atom-protocol is the place to discuss them.
Thanks, -joe On 3/14/06, Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I understand that some tests might be incorrect while the spec is in > development. But if you're going to advertise an APP Test Suite to the > world, the tests have to be backed up with the consensus reflected in > the draft. I found errors in almost every test, so I removed most of > them (though they live on in SVN history, of course). For example, the > test suite claimed that all deletions MUST be met with a 200 status > code. That is quite obviously incorrect. > > I also dispute that the test suite should dictate expected status > codes and the sort of content a server must accept. That seems to miss > the point of REST and HTTP. > > -- > > Robert Sayre > > "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time." > > -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
