On 3/14/06, Joe Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All of the tests have been rolled back in place. If anyone
> has issues with how the test suite interprets the spec(s)
> then atom-protocol is the place to discuss them.
Yeah OK. This thing doesn't even pass the bozo test.
class ShouldRejectUnknownContentTypes(Warning):
text = _('A server should reject content if not given a content-type.')
Not true, not in the spec.
class MustRejectNonWellFormedAtom(Warning):
text = _('A server MUST reject non-wellformed content.')
Not true, not in the spec.
class EntryCreationMustReturn201(Error):
text = _('When an entry is successfully created the server MUST
return an HTTP status code of 201.')
Not in the spec.
> class EntryCreationMustBeReflectedInFeed(Error):
> text = _('When an entry is successfully created it must be added to the
> associated feed.')
Not in the spec.
> class EntryDeletionMustReturn200(Error):
> text = _('When an entry is successfully deleted the status code MUST be 200.')
Not in the spec.
> class EntryDeletionMustBeReflectedInFeed(Error):
> text = _('When an entry is successfully deleted it must be removed from
> the associated feed.')
Not in the spec.
>class LocationHeaderMustMatchLinkRelEdit(Error):
> text = _('The link/@rel="edit" URI must match the URI returned via the
> Link: HTTP header during creation.')
Not in the spec.
> class LinkRelEditResourceInvalid(Error):
> text = _('The link/@rel="edit" URI must be dereferencable.')
All URIs are dereferencable.
--
Robert Sayre
"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
