On Mar 24, 2006, at 12:48 PM, Kyle Marvin wrote:
+1 on tightening the spec. However, I would suggest saying
instead that
if anything does come back, it should be the atom entry as it would
appear in the collection's feed (e.g. a non-editable
representation).
This is helpful in implementations (such as ours) in which server is
annotating the entry with various extensions or attributes that the
client doesn't provide; it is a useful optimization over having the
client issue another request to the URL in the response's Location
header to retrieved the annotated entry.
+1. We see similar usability benefits in echoing back the entry on
POST as opposed to making the client retrieve it immediately. I'd be
-1 on any proposal that explicitly prohibited this.
OK, looks to me like if someone writes a Pace to make this change, it
probably will sail right through. Who's volunteering? -Tim
