http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceUseOneNamespace
#pragma section-numbers off
== Abstract ==
Minor issue. Use one namespace URI for both the introspection doc and
the pub:control element
== Status ==
Proposed
== Rationale ==
Just a minor issue that I came across when implementing support for
pub:control. The current APP draft currently uses two different
namespace URI's for the pub:control and introspection documents. Even
tho the two are intended for two completely different purposes, there
doesn't appear to be much justification for using two different namespaces.
== Proposal ==
Change section 11.1 to:
{{{
This specification defines an Atom Format extension for publishing
control called Atom Publishing Control.
}}}
Change section 11.2 to:
{{{
11.2 The "app:control" Element
namespace app = "http://purl.org/atom/app#"
pubControl =
element app:control {
atomCommonAttributes,
pubDraft?
& extensionElement
}
pubDraft =
element app:draft { "yes" | "no" }
The "app:control" element MAY appear as a child of an "atom:entry" which
is being created or
updated via the Atom Publishing Protocol. The "app:control" element, if
it does appear in an
entry, MUST only appear at most one time. The "app:control" element is
considered foreign
markup as defined in Section 6 of [RFC4287].
The "app:control" element and its child elements MAY be included in Atom
Feed or Entry Documents.
The "app:control" element MAY contain exactly one "app:draft" element as
defined here, and
MAY contain zero or more extension elements as outlined in Section 6 of
[RFC4287]. Both
clients and servers MUST ignore foreign markup present in the
app:control element.
11.2.1 The "app:draft" Element
The number of "app:draft" elements in "pub:control" MUST be zero or one.
Its value MUST be
one of "yes" or "no". A value of "no" means that the entry MAY be made
publicly visible. If
the "app:draft" element is missing then the value MUST be understood to
be "no". The app:draft
element MAY be ignored.
}}}
== Impacts ==
== Notes ==
----
CategoryProposals