On 5/1/06, Bill de hÓra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the plus side, I can see how it's annoying, but I'm -1 on this.
I agree with Bill on both points, and appreciate his articulate explanation following the signed integer. It's, like, a technical conversation.
Having it there means somebody has to justify why some private extension that ultimately locks in client software is being proposed.
Yes, I believe "standards-based" is the huhudious[0] euphemism de jour. But none of our WG members would do that, would they? ;) [0] http://koranteng.blogspot.com/2006/04/huhudious-or-silly-season.html -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
