Re: PaceMediaEntries3

[James M Snell]

Tim Bray wrote:
> Well, do we envision a scenario in which you'd post an atom:feed to an
> APP end-point?  So why don't we just say in the APP spec
> "application/atom+xml" means it accepts Atom Entry docs?  And if they
> did, couldn't you just return code 409 or 415?  -Tim
> 

No, I don't envision such a scenario right now, but that doesn't mean we
should rule it out.... but, I'm fine either way.

- James