2006/5/3, Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 5/3/06, Thomas Broyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2006/5/2, Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > [atom entry w/ no text]
> >
>
> The current draft doesn't help, neither does your "basic" proposal.
<http://franklinmint.fm/2006/01/24/draft-sayre-atompub-protocol-basic-06.html#rfc.section.8.2>
"Clients may include a 'Content-Description' header [RFC2045]
providing a more complete description of the content."
How is that helping servers if the client doesn't include a Content-Description?
And, as I said, PaceMediaEntriesN don't aim at solving this problem
(if one thinks this is a problem). Write a Pace if you think
Content-Description should be included into the spec, I'd probably be
+1.
--
Thomas Broyer
