On 3/5/06 1:24 AM, "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The entry would require a <summary /> tag, but other than that, yes. (I > noticed in the pace that the <summary /> is omitted. however, this would be valid: > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom";> > <title>A picture of the beach</title> > <id>urn:uuid:1225c695-cfb8-4ebb-aaaa-80da344efa6a</id> > <updated>2003-12-13T18:30:02Z</updated> > <author><name>John Doe</name></author> > <link rel="alternate" type="image/png" > src="http://example.org/media/img123.png"/> > <link rel="edit" href="http://example.org/edit/first-post.atom"; /> > <link rel="edit-resource" > href="http://example.org/edit/img123.png"; /> > </entry> having said that, I do prefer the atom:[EMAIL PROTECTED] approach, simply because it models the 1:1 relationship of content:entry. e.
![http://example.org/media/img123.png"/](http://example.org/media/img123.png"/){kind=link}
![http://example.org/edit/img123.png"](http://example.org/edit/img123.png"){kind=link}