Tim Bray wrote:
On Jun 1, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Bill de hÓra wrote:
Any pace that claims to be clarifying this part of the spec needs to
explain where "John Doe" materialized from. I've mentioned this at
least once before, and indicated it's probably acquired in a
stateful/out of protocol manner in the implementations that haven't
been bitten by it. we have patched atom:title but not atom:author (or
atom:summary for meeja resources). I'd like to see this point addressed.
Agreed.
On this - we can table it later if nothing jumps out right now. I don't
think it's worth holding up a decision/draft.
cheers
Bill
