+1
Tim Bray wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 2, 2006, at 1:55 AM, Bill de hÓra wrote:
>
>> Tim Bray wrote:
>>> On Jun 1, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Bill de hÓra wrote:
>>>
>>>> Any pace that claims to be clarifying this part of the spec needs to
>>>> explain where "John Doe" materialized from. I've mentioned this at
>>>> least once before, and indicated it's probably acquired in a
>>>> stateful/out of protocol manner in the implementations that haven't
>>>> been bitten by it. we have patched atom:title but not atom:author
>>>> (or atom:summary for meeja resources). I'd like to see this point
>>>> addressed.
>>> Agreed.
>>
>> On this - we can table it later if nothing jumps out right now. I
>> don't think it's worth holding up a decision/draft.
>
> Actually, I think wording to fill the in the blanks would be helpful.
> Something like:
>
> "Observe that the publishing system in this case filled in some values
> not provided in the original POST. For example, presumably it
> ascertained the author's name via the authentication protocol used to
> establish the right to post."
>
>
>
