On 6/15/06, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But, since we're quoting RFC2616 chapter and verse, I note the following: "If the Request-URI refers to an already existing resource, the enclosed entity SHOULD be considered as a modified version of the one residing on the origin server. " I take that to imply that sending a PUT to the edit URI of an Atom Entry MUST NOT change the atom:id.
Not so much. Please, can we stop with the absurd readings of RFC2616? All that sentence means is "replace what lives there with what's been sent". -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
