And one more:
http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg05322.html -joe On 6/19/06, Joe Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can start working on the -09 draft this evening. Can we get a call on some of the minor text pieces we talked about? http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg05272.html http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg05148.html http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg05216.html Thanks, -joe On 6/19/06, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <co-chair-mode>We think that the WG has basically achieved consensus > on a lot of the discussions that are in progress (with the notable > exception of the MUST-ness on what comes back from a POST). So it's > time for the co-editors to capture that consensus and produce a > protocol-09 so we can do a level set. > > Sooner would be better. > > By next Monday morning, 9AM Eastern, would be really good to avoid > one of the periodic IETF cut-offs. > > When can we have one?</co-chair-mode> > > -Tim > > -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
-- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
