On Jun 19, 2006, at 11:02 AM, Joe Gregorio wrote:
I can start working on the -09 draft this evening. Can we get a
call on some of
the minor text pieces we talked about?
http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg05272.html
My guidance to the editors would be to insert the suggested text.
The argument by parallel to RFC4287 is a good one, and nobody seemed
to object.
http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg05148.html
There were 14 comments in that thread, Lisa's being the only one that
seemed to think there was a problem that the spec could usefully
address. My guidance is to let this one go.
http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg05216.html
I think that one was covered in the PME5 edit described in http://
www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/maillist.html#05216 - in
particular the last change to 8.1
-Tim
