On 7/1/06, Bjoern Hoehrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

In the next paragraph wording like "strongly encouraged" is rather
misleading; if you don't want it to be RECOMMENDED, this should use
something like "recommended but not required".

Yes, James was previously instructed not to do protocol specification
in the Security Considerations section. He has cunningly replaced the
previous text with improper protocol specification.

--

Robert Sayre

"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."

Reply via email to