I guess I'm not a member of the WG, but I just wanted to state my opinions.
Tim Bray wrote: > > There is a clear irritant in protocol-09 in that an XML Document > referred to as an "Introspection Document" has a root element named > <service> and contains collections grouped into workspaces. It arguably > sucks that the name of the document corresponds well neither with its > root nor its contents. Here are the things we could do: > > 1. Leave everything as is, it's just an irritant not actually a bug. > > 2. Leave the markup as is, but in the spec, rename the Introspection doc > the Service doc. > +1 > 3. Leave the markup as is, but in the spec, rename the Introspection doc > the Workspaces doc. > > 4. Leave the markup as is, but in the spec, rename the Introspection doc > the Collections doc. > > 5. Leave the human-readable part of the spec as is and change the root > element to <app:instrospection> +1 > > Would WG members please do us a favor and record their +/- feelings on > these five options. Failing to respond constitutes a +1 on option 1 > (leave it as is). > > -Tim > > All of these can be avoided if introspection document would be a feed of course. :)
