Bob Wyman wrote:
I know that I've said this before, but I think it would make much more sense to remove the overloading by having the date of modification specified by atom:modified and then a second optional mechanism for explicitly stating the "importance" of the update. "Importance" could be indicated by either an element or an attribute. i.e. one of:
<modified>...</modified><importance>high</importance> Or <modified importance="high">...</modified>
I can see the point of doing this. However I don't think it's reasonable to proceed with a new set of control code attribute values until we establish an extension mechanism for the ones we already have.
cheers Bill
