On 11/3/04 4:23 PM, "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A) I'm fine/OK with the exact new wording in the Pace.
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Sascha Carlin
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Robert Sayre
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition John Panzer
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Graham
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Bill de h�ra
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Antone Roundy
- RE: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Bob Wyman
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Tim Bray
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition David Czarnecki
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Eric Scheid
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Martin Duerst
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Asbj�rn Ulsberg
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Danny Ayers
- RE: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Bob Wyman
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Antone Roundy
- Re: Consensus probe on PaceUpdatedDefinition Danny Ayers
