On Nov 8, 2004, at 1:56 PM, Graham wrote:
Slightly OT, but why did you bother to define a category construct if you're only using it once? It's not good for readability
Twice. Once in feed and once in entry. There are a lot of "Constructs" defined for precisely this reason, i.e. two usages. If a lot of people agree with Graham that this is awkward, I'm sure our editors would be happy to address it. You could replicate it or, for the occurrence in atom:head you could say 'For details, see the description in "atom:entry"'. I think the latter would be an improvement, but I don't think it's a big deal. -Tim
