On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 02:21:57 +0100, Henry Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps what should be done is not so much declare victory on the > format, but move everyone to help solve the problems with the atom API > that seems currently to be completely at a standstill. > > There is a mailing list available to discuss that topic at > http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/index.html > > Let's perhaps slow down the movement on the syntax front and move to > completing the API side of things. That way we can use the API to help > polish the syntax.
+1 to working on the protocol and using it to polish the format. -1 to PaceDeclareVictoryOnFormat since we are missing: 1. Any mention of extensibility in the format spec. 2. A feed level 'image' element, ala RSS 2.0 which, "Specifies a GIF, JPEG or PNG image that can be displayed with the channel." -joe -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
