Tim Bray wrote:
>3. You get help for aggregate feeds using atom:origin
I have explained on numerous occasions[1] why atom:origin is useless
in the context of aggregate feeds. As far as I can see, atom:origin was
"slipped" into the spec with very little review and the alternatives to it
were never seriously and openly discussed.
To do anything useful in the aggregate feed cases, we need to
support PaceHeadInEntry which is basically the same proposal I've been
making ever since the spring and that was discussed at the Atom Community
meeting at Sun...
Before you cut off debate on Atom, you should at least provide an
opportunity of review for the issues that have been lying ignored on the
table.
bob wyman
[1] http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg11090.html
