On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:54:31 +0800, Zhang Yining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would the semantic be if feed has category "programming/java" and > one entry of it has category of "photography"? Or we leave the > consistency to producer to manage? That's tricky, but I'm not sure we can really say much without treading on individual schemes. Maybe just have a default assumption that in such a case the entry would be considered to be in both categories. > This term/label might solve the issue when the user changes the > name(label) for a category, but the user has the extra burden to > maintain the terms, labels and their mappings. Hopefully their software would look after that.I imagine that in many cases the term and label would be the same string. > Does the absence of category construct for entry imply the category of > the entry defaults to that of the feed? I guess not. Need to clarify > this bit. Good question. Suggestions? > Do we allow multiple category construct with the same (scheme, term) but > different labels? In following example, the second label is the Chinese > translation for "Animation". > > <entry> > <category scheme="http://dmoz.org"; term="/Arts/Animation/" > label="Animation" /> > <category scheme="http://dmoz.org"; term="/Arts/Animation/" label="å > ç" /> > </entry> Oo, again, tricky. Suggestions? I'm not entirely sure how best the label language should be dealt with either. Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
