atom-syntax  

Messages by Date

• 2010/05/14 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Dominik Tomaszuk
• 2010/05/14 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. James Snell
• 2010/05/13 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Dominik Tomaszuk
• 2010/05/13 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Dominik Tomaszuk
• 2010/05/12 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Peter Krantz
• 2010/05/12 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. James Snell
• 2010/05/12 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Peter Krantz
• 2010/05/12 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Richard Salz
• 2010/05/12 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. James Snell
• 2010/05/12 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Peter Keane
• 2010/05/12 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Martin Atkins
• 2010/05/12 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. James Snell
• 2010/05/12 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Peter Keane
• 2010/05/12 Call for comments: OPDS Catalogs 0.9 draft, an Atom-based standard for ebook distribution Keith Fahlgren
• 2010/05/12 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Bob Wyman
• 2010/05/12 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. James Snell
• 2010/05/06 atom validator Ed Summers
• 2010/05/05 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. John Panzer
• 2010/05/04 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Bob Wyman
• 2010/05/04 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Richard Salz
• 2010/05/04 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Bob Wyman
• 2010/05/04 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Richard Salz
• 2010/05/04 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Bob Wyman
• 2010/05/04 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Niklas Lindström
• 2010/05/04 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Peter Keane
• 2010/05/04 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Niklas Lindström
• 2010/05/04 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. James Snell
• 2010/05/04 Re: Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Peter Keane
• 2010/05/04 Link Extensions. Need "md5" or some kind of hash. Bob Wyman
• 2010/04/09 Change Proposal to HTML WG to *remove* the algorithm for generating Atom feeds from HTML content Julian Reschke
• 2010/04/08 Re: Change Proposal to HTML WG to fix the algorithm for generating Atom feeds from HTML content Julian Reschke
• 2010/04/07 Re: Change Proposal to HTML WG to fix the algorithm for generating Atom feeds from HTML content Tim Bray
• 2010/04/07 Re: Change Proposal to HTML WG to fix the algorithm for generating Atom feeds from HTML content James Holderness
• 2010/04/07 Re: RFC 5829 on Link Relation Types for Simple Version Navigation between Web Resources Julian Reschke
• 2010/04/07 Re: Change Proposal to HTML WG to fix the algorithm for generating Atom feeds from HTML content Julian Reschke
• 2010/04/06 Re: Change Proposal to HTML WG to fix the algorithm for generating Atom feeds from HTML content James Holderness
• 2010/04/06 Change Proposal to HTML WG to fix the algorithm for generating Atom feeds from HTML content Julian Reschke
• 2010/04/03 Fwd: I-D Action:draft-nottingham-http-link-header-09.txt Mark Nottingham
• 2010/03/03 Re: URI Templates in Atom links Asbjørn Ulsberg
• 2010/03/02 Re: URI Templates in Atom links Julian Reschke
• 2010/03/02 Re: URI Templates in Atom links Jan Algermissen
• 2010/03/01 Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-nottingham-http-link-header-08.txt Mark Nottingham
• 2010/02/26 Re: URI Templates in Atom links Joe Gregorio
• 2010/02/26 URI Templates in Atom links James Abley
• 2010/02/19 RE: Looking for Atom readers supporting RFC 5005 ? James Holderness
• 2010/02/19 Re: Looking for Atom readers supporting RFC 5005 ? Sergey Beryozkin
• 2010/02/18 RE: Looking for Atom readers supporting RFC 5005 ? James Holderness
• 2010/02/18 Re: Looking for Atom readers supporting RFC 5005 ? Sergey Beryozkin
• 2010/02/18 Re: atom tombstones Asbjørn Ulsberg
• 2010/02/12 Re: atom tombstones Niklas Lindström
• 2010/02/11 Re: atom tombstones Ed Summers
• 2010/02/11 Re: atom tombstones jasnell
• 2010/02/11 Re: atom tombstones Niklas Lindström
• 2010/02/11 Re: atom tombstones Erik Wilde
• 2010/02/11 Re: atom tombstones Ross Singer
• 2010/02/11 Re: atom tombstones Peter Krantz
• 2010/02/11 atom tombstones Ed Summers
• 2010/02/09 Re: Feed paging: entries count, current page Jan Algermissen
• 2010/02/09 Feed paging: entries count, current page Dmitri Popov
• 2010/01/27 Fwd: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard Mark Nottingham
• 2010/01/22 Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-07.txt Julian Reschke
• 2010/01/12 Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-06.txt Julian Reschke
• 2009/12/15 Re: Last Call: draft-brown-versioning-link-relations (Link Relations for Simple Version Navigation) to Informational RFC Julian Reschke
• 2009/12/11 Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-05.txt Julian Reschke
• 2009/12/10 Re: Media Attributes For Links Mo McRoberts
• 2009/12/10 RE: Media Attributes For Links Lindsley Brett-ABL001
• 2009/12/10 Re: Majordomo results: unsubscribe Rafik Dammak
• 2009/12/10 Re: Media Attributes For Links Mo McRoberts
• 2009/12/10 Re: Media Attributes For Links Dmitri Popov
• 2009/12/09 Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-05.txt Geoffrey M Clemm
• 2009/12/09 Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-05.txt Jan Algermissen
• 2009/12/08 Media Attributes For Links Lindsley Brett-ABL001
• 2009/12/07 Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-05.txt Julian Reschke
• 2009/12/05 Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-04.txt Julian Reschke
• 2009/12/04 Re: (Opposite of working-copy?) Comment on draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/12/02 Fwd: draft-nottingham-http-link-relation-07 progress Mark Nottingham
• 2009/12/02 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/12/02 Re: (Opposite of working-copy?) Comment on draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Al Brown
• 2009/12/02 Re: (Opposite of working-copy?) Comment on draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/12/02 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/12/02 (Opposite of working-copy?) Comment on draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Jan Algermissen
• 2009/12/01 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Jan Algermissen
• 2009/12/01 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Asbjørn Ulsberg
• 2009/12/01 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/12/01 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/11/30 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Jan Algermissen
• 2009/11/30 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Geoffrey M Clemm
• 2009/11/30 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/11/30 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Jan Algermissen
• 2009/11/30 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/11/29 Re: Can atom-namespaced elements be allowed as foreign markup? Peter Keane
• 2009/11/29 Can atom-namespaced elements be allowed as foreign markup? John Panzer
• 2009/11/28 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Jan Algermissen
• 2009/11/27 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Jan Algermissen
• 2009/11/27 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/11/26 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/11/26 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Jan Algermissen
• 2009/11/26 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Jan Algermissen
• 2009/11/26 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Jan Algermissen
• 2009/11/26 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/11/26 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/11/26 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Sam Johnston
• 2009/11/26 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Jan Algermissen
• 2009/11/26 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/11/26 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/11/26 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Jan Algermissen
• 2009/11/26 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/11/24 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Sam Johnston
• 2009/11/24 Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/11/24 Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Jan Algermissen
• 2009/11/20 last-calling I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03 Julian Reschke
• 2009/11/19 Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-02.txt Julian Reschke
• 2009/11/12 Re: Input on request for link relation Bill de hOra
• 2009/11/12 Re: Input on request for link relation Sam Johnston
• 2009/11/12 Re: Input on request for link relation Richard Salz
• 2009/11/12 Re: Input on request for link relation Bill de hOra
• 2009/11/12 Re: Input on request for link relation Sam Johnston
• 2009/11/11 Re: Input on request for link relation Joe Gregorio
• 2009/10/29 FYI Salmon protocol built on top of Atom + extensions John Panzer
• 2009/10/20 Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized Peter Krantz
• 2009/10/20 Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized jasnell
• 2009/10/18 Social Web Camp, Santa Clara Nov 2nd Story Henry
• 2009/10/18 Re: atom:feedset proposal James Holderness
• 2009/10/18 Re: atom:feedset proposal Sam Johnston
• 2009/10/16 Ranking extension status Philippe Converset
• 2009/10/15 Re: atom:feedset proposal Mo McRoberts
• 2009/10/15 Re: atom:feedset proposal James Holderness
• 2009/10/15 Re: atom:feedset proposal Mo McRoberts
• 2009/10/15 Re: atom:feedset proposal Peter Keane
• 2009/10/15 Re: atom:feedset proposal Mo McRoberts
• 2009/10/15 Re: atom:feedset proposal Martin Atkins
• 2009/10/15 atom:feedset proposal Mo McRoberts
• 2009/10/01 Re: atom:icon/logo in atom:entry Sam Johnston
• 2009/10/01 atom:icon/logo in atom:entry Antonio Tapiador del Dujo
• 2009/09/26 Re: Input on request for link relation Mark Nottingham
• 2009/09/25 IETF patent policy Lisa Dusseault
• 2009/09/21 Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized Ed Summers
• 2009/09/21 Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized Bob Wyman
• 2009/09/21 Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ] Robert Sayre
• 2009/09/21 Re: Input on request for link relation Sam Johnston
• 2009/09/21 Re: Input on request for link relation Mark Nottingham
• 2009/09/20 Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ] Mark Nottingham
• 2009/09/20 Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ] Robert Sayre
• 2009/09/20 Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ] Sam Johnston
• 2009/09/20 Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ] Robert Sayre
• 2009/09/18 Re: [pubsubhubbub] Re: Input on request for link relation Martin Atkins
• 2009/09/17 Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ] John Panzer
• 2009/09/17 Re: Input on request for link relation Sam Johnston
• 2009/09/16 Re: Input on request for link relation Mark Nottingham
• 2009/09/16 Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ] Mark Nottingham
• 2009/09/16 Re: Input on request for link relation Sam Johnston
• 2009/09/16 Re: Input on request for link relation Sam Johnston
• 2009/09/15 Re: Input on request for link relation Mark Nottingham
• 2009/09/15 Re: Input on request for link relation Mark Nottingham
• 2009/09/11 Re: Input on request for link relation John Panzer
• 2009/09/11 Re: Input on request for link relation Adam Roach
• 2009/09/11 Re: Input on request for link relation Peter Saint-Andre
• 2009/09/11 Re: Input on request for link relation Sam Johnston
• 2009/09/11 Re: Input on request for link relation Peter Saint-Andre
• 2009/09/11 Re: Input on request for link relation Peter Saint-Andre
• 2009/09/11 Re: Input on request for link relation Hadrien Gardeur
• 2009/09/11 Re: Input on request for link relation Sam Johnston
• 2009/09/11 Re: Input on request for link relation Julian Reschke
• 2009/09/11 Re: Input on request for link relation Hadrien Gardeur
• 2009/09/11 Re: Input on request for link relation Sam Johnston
• 2009/09/10 Re: Input on request for link relation Jan Algermissen
• 2009/09/10 Re: Input on request for link relation John Panzer
• 2009/09/10 Re: Input on request for link relation Jan Algermissen
• 2009/09/10 Input on request for link relation Lisa Dusseault
• 2009/09/09 Re: Link Relations: up/down vs parent/child vs ancestor/descendant etc. Nikunj R. Mehta
• 2009/09/08 Link Relations: up/down vs parent/child vs ancestor/descendant etc. Sam Johnston
• 2009/09/07 Re: link/@type and content negotiation Erik Wilde
• 2009/09/07 Re: Atom Versioning James Holderness
• 2009/09/07 Re: Atom Versioning Aristotle Pagaltzis
• 2009/09/07 Re: Atom Versioning Jan Algermissen
• 2009/09/05 Re: Atom Versioning Aristotle Pagaltzis
• 2009/09/04 Re: link/@type and content negotiation Peter Keane
• 2009/09/04 link/@type and content negotiation Erik Wilde
• 2009/09/01 Atom Versioning Jan Algermissen
• 2009/08/31 Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
• 2009/08/21 Extensions for link (slug) Niklas Lindström
• 2009/08/11 New I-D on " Advanced Security Processing for Atom and APP Documents" Richard Salz
• 2009/07/29 Re: Atom Bar BoF in Stockholm Julian Reschke
• 2009/07/26 Re: Atom Bar BoF in Stockholm Lisa Dusseault
• 2009/07/22 Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom Mark Nottingham
• 2009/07/21 Atom Bar BoF in Stockholm Mark Nottingham
• 2009/07/20 Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom Colm Divilly
• 2009/07/15 Fwd: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard Mark Nottingham
• 2009/07/15 Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01 Nikunj R. Mehta
• 2009/07/15 Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01 Mark Nottingham
• 2009/07/15 Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01 Nikunj R. Mehta
• 2009/07/14 Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01 Mark Nottingham
• 2009/07/14 Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom Mark Nottingham
• 2009/07/14 Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom Erik Wilde
• 2009/07/14 Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom Colm Divilly
• 2009/07/13 Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01 Nikunj R. Mehta
• 2009/07/13 update properties of versioned entries Erik Wilde
• 2009/07/13 Re: extension for update properties Erik Wilde
• 2009/07/13 Re: extension for update properties Keith Fahlgren
• 2009/07/13 Re: extension for update properties Martin Atkins

• Earlier messages
• Later messages