On 10/11/04 2:37 PM, "Antone Roundy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't think of any reason to allow relative URIs...nor any reason why > anyone would attempt to use one...so maybe it doesn't matter that much. > But unless there would be some value in allowing relative URIs, we may > as well nail this down more tightly. I can think of reasons to disallow relative URIs, all to do with the intended use of the URI as tokens needing exact-matching-comparisons, not addresses for retrieval. +1 to "absolute URI" e.
