Antone Roundy wrote: > > Yeah, I'm still lurking here. > > First, let me state the obvious: a signature enables you to verify that > the data you received hasn't been changed since it was signed by a > particular entity. It seems to me that there are a few things we might > want to do with that ability: > > [snip] > 2) Verify that the data is as it was when produced by the original > creator (would require preservation of the signature). > > [snip] > From what others have said, #2 doesn't sound possible. #1 clearly is > possible. So what about #3? Might something like this be done? > > [snip] #2 is possible so long as the server is implemented to do it. The client cannot make any blind assumptions about what the server will do. Before the client attempts to interact with the server, it had better know what the server will do. - James
- Atom protocol and digital signatures Sam Hartman
- Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures Tim Bray
- Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures Lisa Dusseault
- Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures James M Snell
- Re: Atom protocol and digital signat... Lisa Dusseault
- Re: Atom protocol and digital s... James M Snell
- Re: Atom protocol and digit... Tim Bray
- Re: Atom protocol and d... James M Snell
- Re: Atom protocol and d... Antone Roundy
- Re: Atom protocol and d... James M Snell
- Re: Atom protocol and d... Paul Hoffman
- Re: Atom protocol and d... Tim Bray
- Re: Atom protocol and d... Joe Gregorio
- Re: Atom protocol and d... James M Snell
- Re: Atom protocol and d... Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Atom protocol and d... James M Snell
- Re: Atom protocol and d... Paul Hoffman
- Re: Atom protocol and d... James M Snell
- Re: Atom protocol and d... Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Atom protocol and d... Julian Reschke
