I'd be fine with either. There definitely might be some sense in chartering an Atom Extensions WG that can look at various things like the Features draft.
I do, however, believe that keeping at least one of the mailing lists active would be an extremely good idea so that those of us who are working on extensions can continue to engage the community. - James Paul Hoffman wrote: > > Greetings again. As y'all may have noticed, the Atompub WG finally > completed our milestones. In the IETF, this normally has one of two > consequences: > > - The WG shuts down, with the mailing list remaining open > > - A new charter is agreed to, and the WG continues > > Tim and I feel that the former is appropriate, but it is also > appropriate to ask if people have suggestions for the latter. If the WG > does recharter, Tim and I will step down, and Lisa will find one or two > new leaders for the WG. > > Comments? > >
