* James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-12 17:15]: > I do, however, believe that keeping at least one of the mailing > lists active would be an extremely good idea
Per Paul’s message that was going to be the case anyhow. > There definitely might be some sense in chartering an Atom > Extensions WG that can look at various things like the Features > draft. Instituting such a WG would mean a concerted effort to produce a particular spec. At the time being, most extensions are interesting to few people only, and even for those with broader appeal, the interested folks are divided along too many lines, not to mention that implementation experience is generally limited as yet. So it seems to me that setting up an Atom Extensions WG would be premature at this time. Any work on extensions could be conducted via the mailing list, which will remain around after all, and invidual submissions. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
