On 8/12/07 12:35 PM, "James Holderness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone that thinks tombstones (in any form) can be used to destroy evidence > of misposts is going to be sorely disappointed. They're a convenience for > the reader not the author. The author gets to say: 'I don't think you should > waste your time reading this post', but it's ultimately the reader's > decision to follow that recommendation. /me still amused by "So-n-so would like to recall the message 'x'" emails e.
