Hi James,

quoted from draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-04:

>Linked "trash" resources are orthogonal to the at:deleted-entry
element and are intended to provide servers with a way of allowing
clients to recover deleted entries.

Is there a consensus on recovery mechanism that can (or should it?) be
included in tombstones extension?

>For instance, the entries in a feed may be managed by two
separate authors, one of whom may delete an entry that
the other author wishes to later recover.  If a trash feed
is provided, the second author can look for a copy of the
deleted entry there.

In this example, does it imply that a trash feed should contain full
representation copy of entries, so that the second author can simply
retrieve the copy and POST it back to the original collection feed?

-- 
Teo Hui Ming

Reply via email to