On 09/01/2008, at 9:59 AM, James Holderness wrote:
And yet the syntax that Tatsuya Noyori suggested, Brian agreed
with, and you +1ed, didn't actually use an atom:id - the id was in
the tombstone namespace. Getting that confused, seems to me a far
more likely problem.
Good point.
My preference would be to put it all in the Atom namespace, as
elements. If that's controversial (either because it's using atom:id
et al out of context, or because of the namespace issue), attributes
are the path of least resistance.
Cheers,
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
