This is definitely good to hear.
- James
Eric Lunt wrote:
I'd definitely be interested in this as well, and we could update
FeedBurner's namespace translation to help ease the transition between
old and new clients so that even if someone used the new namespace, for
example, we could still generate the appropriate iTunes tags when iTunes
comes calling for the feed. I still think there's a lot of promise in
the Media RSS namespace, but the lack of activity and support around it
makes me a little hesitant to recommend it.
- Eric
On Jan 16, 2008 9:55 AM, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
All it would really take are implementors willing to support the
extensions once they were defined and a group of individuals willing to
do the work to define them. I'm willing to help.
- James
Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote:
>
> Peter Keane a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, James M Snell wrote:
>>
>>> I had been involved in some discussions a while back geared towards
>>> working on a standard set of media extensions derived from the
itunes
>>> and yahoo media extensions. Unfortunately, that work never
>>> progressed. Such work would certainly not be unwelcome.
>>>
>>> - James
>>
>> Absolutely. It would be a huge boon for the sort of work we are
>> trying to do. MIT's OpenCourseWare, ITunes U, etc. are all the
rage.
>> A Media-rich Atom standard would be a no-brainer for that area (and
>> with FeedSync or a FeedSync-type standard along with it, a very
>> powerful platform indeed).
>>
>> Any thoughts on how such a process might be re-booted?
>
> I concur and I'd join such work if it existed.
>
> - Sylvain
>
>
