On 27/1/08 7:35 AM, "James Holderness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> <x:person scheme="http://example.org/roles"; term="director"> >> <name>Linda</name> >> </x:person> > > Any reason why these can't be atom:contributor elements, possibly with an > x:role attribute or sub-element? Would be more useful to clients not > supporting the extension and I don't think it would be an inappropriate use > of atom:contributor. hmm .. in drafting RFC 4287 did we disallow the following construct: <contributor> <name>Linda</name> <category scheme="http://example.org/roles"; term="director " /> </contributor> (sidenote: if this is illegal in Atom 1.0 (RFC 4287), would this be something that would require a new version to introduce (eg. Atom 1.1) with corresponding tweaking of the xmlns:atom?) e.
