Bill de hOra wrote:
> Let me it another way - do we need to make categories
> resources and provide them with atom:ids? If so, let's do that.
RFC 4287 says:
The "term" attribute is a string that identifies the
category to which the entry or feed belongs. Category
elements MUST have a "term" attribute.
The "scheme" attribute is an IRI that identifies a
categorization scheme. Category elements MAY have a
"scheme" attribute.
In other words, categories are (supposed to be) uniquely identified by @term,
not by (@scheme, @term). So, terms must be globally unique to be unambiguous
and so they SHOULD (IMO) be IRIs already.
- Brian
