On 30/5/08 5:57 AM, "Pete Brunet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it always the case that the icon/logo is only "eye candy" and that the > useful information is what is found in atom:title/subtitle? If that's the > case I don't see a need for any changes to atom:icon/logo. unlike images embedded into web pages, the icon/logo for the feed doesn't have separate meaning from the title/subtitle for the feed ... so I'd say it's role is 'eyecandy' as you say. e.
