* Pete Brunet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-29 22:10]: > BS: <atom:title> and <atom:subtitle> could be considered the > accessible alternative for the icon and logo.
That is kind of backwards. The main content *is* atom:title and atom:subtitle. The atom:icon and atom:logo are in fact secondary, purely graphical representations: > Is it always the case that the icon/logo is only "eye candy" > and that the useful information is what is found in > atom:title/subtitle? The only purpose of those elements is visual branding. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
