On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > think of it as subtle incentive to mint more specific and appropriate @rel > values =) > Setting the question of "more and appropriate @rel values" aside, why prefer rel="printer-friendly" over rel="print"? I.e., if people really do want to go there, why not at least stay consistent with the HTML4/CSS2 media naming conventions? http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#h-6.13 http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/media.html But instead of changing the rel value away from the perfectly reasonable "alternate", why not just add @media to the link? <link rel="alternate" media="print" type="text/html" href="http://www.xml.com/?print=1"/> This is also where HTML5 is headed: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#the-link -DeWitt
