* Peter Keane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-08 05:30]:
> But the spec says it "assigns no meaning to the content" and
> the RNC seems to allow it.
If the validator went strictly by the spec (the RNC is informal
anyway) then it couldn’t flag many obvious errors because of
Atom’s mustIgnore nature. Typos like `<caetgory>` would have to
be considered valid, f.ex., even though nothing will process such
a feed correctly.
> I am getting an error from the feedvalidator for text in the
> atom:category element:
>
> <category term='breed'>siberian husky</category>
>
> I'd like to use atom:category here instead of:
>
> <x:breed>siberian husky</breed>
>
> which DOES validate.
I am not sure what it is supposed to mean. Isn’t the text in the
element semantically significant? It seems to me you are looking
for this:
<category
scheme="http://example.org/breed";
term="siberian-husky" />
Maybe with a `label="siberian husky"` thrown in for humans.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
