On 18/1/09 3:29 AM, "Peter Keane" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suppose what I'd like to see is a l...@rel that says "without which > I would have no meaning/reason to exist" and another that says "this > is related, by I can stand on my own". > > The latter is (I think) adequately captured by l...@rel="related", > while for expressing the former, we only have thr:in-reply-to. > Bookmarking certainly requires the former (i.e., the bookmark has no > meaning w/o the thing being bookmarked). l...@rel="referent" ref·er·ent (n) - the thing or idea that a symbol, word, or phrase denotes e.
