* Martin Atkins <[email protected]> [2009-01-13 19:05]: > What are you referring to in RFC4685? (Atom Threading > Extensions) > > The "replies" link relation? I'm not sure that it means what we > need for this use-case.
No, the `in-reply-to` element. It doesn’t sound like the link relation was I thinking of at first glance but the definitions are congruent. Even my proposal for how it could be usefully displayed is essentially that of a thread. It’s kind of embarrassing that I didn’t notice immediately. (Nearly no one supports 4685, of course. But then neither do they support the hypothetical link relation.) Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
