> is @for in the undefined or null namespace?
Yes, because there didn't seem to be a need to put it into its own
namespace. I'd rather avoid the clutter, but if the WG wants a separate
namespace that's fine with me.
> 'direct child' .. are you thinking there might be multiple direct
children
> of atom:content, like this:
>
>
> <link rel="schema" href="..." for="foo" />
> <link rel="schema" href="..." for="bar" />
> <atom:content type="application/xml+something">
> <foo:blarg>...</foo:blarg>
> <bar:blarg>...</bar:blarg>
> </atom:content>
Yes.
Although I'd pick "snl:floorwax" and "snl:desert-topping" as my examples.
:)
/r$
--
Visiting Member, IBM Academy
STSM, DataPower Chief Programmer
WebSphere DataPower SOA Appliances
http://www.ibm.com/software/integration/datapower/
