Requiring atom:head in entries posted without an enclosing feed is fine. I'll go ahead and make that change.
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 02:42:34 -0500, Bob Wyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would strongly recommend that it be required that an atom:entry that is > published with no enclosing atom:feed MUST contain an atom:head element. If > this is not the case, the published atom:entries will be essentially > anonymous and thus largely useless. Virtually every Atom processor in > existence requires elements of atom:head when handling entries. I can > imagine very few applications (other than closed ones) that could make use > of atom:entries that do not contain atom:head elements and are not > themselves enclosed in atom:feeds. > > bob wyman > > -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
