> the
> cost must be kept very near zero.

Tim: Agreed, although I'm not sure that's possible.

Right now, if someone subscribes to a feed and gets nothing, I can say
"Look, the publisher is producing ill-formed XML/invalid Atom/etc."
and leave it at that. I've got a legitimate finger to point. But
atom:must-understand drops my resources and design objectives directly
into the hands of every A-lister in the blogosphere. They can
effectively demand that I support whatever they want me to support.

I sympathize with those who have harmless uses for this sort of thing,
but I really don't want to face the inevitable Atomic soup nazis.
Definite -1.

--
Roger Benningfield

Reply via email to